From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oA1ARc0T201183 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 05:27:38 -0500 Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 09A07142392 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 03:28:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (server655-han.de-nserver.de [85.158.177.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id l73FIOYQHaAtVO1W for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 03:28:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CCE9669.4030904@profihost.ag> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:28:57 +0100 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1 References: <4CC67450.9020602@profihost.ag> <20101026092205.086c0d89@galadriel.home> <4CC68249.7050409@profihost.ag> <4CCE73C8.8070705@profihost.ag> <20101101111142.5db7fa4e@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: <20101101111142.5db7fa4e@galadriel.home> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Emmanuel Florac Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com >> but today i got again hundrets of these messages: >> [318343.901809] Filesystem "sdc3": XFS internal error >> xfs_da_do_buf(2) > > That's weird. What do "uname -a" and "free" tells? I'm wondering if > there isn't some low memory condition at work here. # uname -a Linux server 2.6.32.22intel #1 SMP Tue Sep 21 11:05:46 CEST 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux # free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 16470416 15098888 1371528 0 48 6019036 -/+ buffers/cache: 9079804 7390612 Swap: 1469908 0 1469908 Stefan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs