From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oA1Dkuvn214900 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:46:57 -0500 Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B64181E8AF1B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 06:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (server655-han.de-nserver.de [85.158.177.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 2Pj1AWeKWEoZnAMj for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 06:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CCEC51E.6060202@profihost.ag> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:48:14 +0100 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Pid: 8345, comm: rsync Not tainted 2.6.32.22intel #1 References: <4CC67450.9020602@profihost.ag> <20101026092205.086c0d89@galadriel.home> <4CC68249.7050409@profihost.ag> <4CCE73C8.8070705@profihost.ag> <20101101122751.GL2715@dastard> <4CCEB27E.1000605@profihost.ag> <20101101142933.4911a30c@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: <20101101142933.4911a30c@galadriel.home> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com > Did you run the "verify" round on the array after the upgrade? That > would rebuild all checksum and insure that the RAID is fully coherent. > If the verify comes out with any message, there is a sloght chance that > the data on disk wasn't entirely coherent or clean. shure i have - was done without any problems. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs