From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs_repair of critical volume
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:14:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CDDBC5C.7020708@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201011121422.28993@zmi.at>
Michael Monnerie put forth on 11/12/2010 7:22 AM:
> I find the robustness of XFS amazing: You overwrote 1/5th of the disk
> with zeroes, and it still works :-)
This isn't "robustness" Michael. If anything it's a serious problem.
XFS is reporting that hundreds or thousands of files that have been
physically removed still exist. Regardless of how he arrived at this
position, how is this "robust"? Most people would consider this
inconsistency of state a "corruption" situation, not "robustness".
--
Stan
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-12 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-31 7:54 xfs_repair of critical volume Eli Morris
2010-10-31 9:54 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-12 8:48 ` Eli Morris
2010-11-12 13:22 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-11-12 22:14 ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2010-11-13 8:19 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-13 9:28 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-13 15:35 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-11-14 3:31 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-12-04 10:30 ` Martin Steigerwald
2010-12-05 4:49 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-12-05 9:44 ` Roger Willcocks
2010-11-12 23:01 ` Eli Morris
2010-11-13 15:25 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-11-14 11:05 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-15 4:09 ` Eli Morris
2010-11-16 0:04 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-17 7:29 ` Eli Morris
2010-11-17 7:47 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-30 7:22 ` Eli Morris
2010-12-02 11:33 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-12-03 0:58 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-12-04 0:43 ` Eli Morris
2010-10-31 14:10 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-31 14:41 ` Steve Costaras
2010-10-31 16:52 ` Roger Willcocks
2010-11-01 22:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-11-01 23:32 ` Eli Morris
2010-11-02 0:14 ` Eric Sandeen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-31 19:56 Eli Morris
2010-10-31 20:40 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-01 3:40 ` Eli Morris
2010-11-01 10:07 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-10-31 21:10 ` Steve Costaras
2010-11-01 15:03 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CDDBC5C.7020708@hardwarefreak.com \
--to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox