Re: xfs_repair of critical volume

Steve Costaras
2010-10-31T21:08:49Z

On 2010-10-31 14:56, Eli Morris wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Thanks for all the responses. On the XFS volume that I'm trying to recover here, I've already re-initialized the RAID, so I've kissed that data goodbye. I am using LVM2. Each of the 5 RAID volumes is a physical volume. Then a logical volume is created out of those, and then the filesystem lies on top of that. So now we have, in order, 2 intact PVs, 1 OK, but blank PV, 2 intact PVs. On the RAID where we lost the drives, replacements are in place and I created a now healthy volume. Through LVM, I was then able to create a new PV from the re-constituted RAID volume and put that into our logical volume in place of the destroyed PV. So now, I have a logical volume that I can activate and I can see the filesystem. It still reports as having all the old files as before, although it doesn't. So the hardware is now OK. It's just what to do with our damaged filesystem that has a huge chunk missing out of it. I put the xfs_repair trial output on an http server, as suggested (good sug!
ge!
> stion) and it is here:

What was your raid stripe size (hardware)? Did you have any
partitioning scheme on the hdw raid volumes or did you just use the
native device? When you created the volume group & lv did you do any
striping or just concatenation of the luns? if striping what was your
lvcreate parameters (stripe size et al).

You mentioned that you lost only 1 of the 5 arrays. Assuming the
others did not have any failures? You wiped the array that failed so
you have 4/5 of the data and 1/5 is zeroed. Which removes the
possibility of vendor recovery/assistance.

Assuming that everything is equal there should be an equal distribution
of files across the AG's and the AG's should have been distributed
across the 5 volumes. Do you have the xfs_info data? I think you
may be a bit out of luck here with xfs_repair. I am not sure how XFS
handles files/fragmentation between AG's and AG's relation to the
underlying 'physical volume'. I.e. problem would be if a particular
AG was on a different volume than the blocks of the actual file,
likewise another complexity would be fragmented files where data was not
contiguous. What is the average size of the files that you had on the
volume?

In similar circumstances if files were small enough to be on the
remaining disks and contiguous/non fragmented I've had some luck w/
forensic tools Foremost & Scalpel.

Steve