From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oAM96hYk209949 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:06:44 -0600 Received: from mail.ims.co.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E8D2D1989DF for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 01:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ims.co.at (mail.ims.co.at [81.223.138.19]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JIseD0Bnc31VT6Az for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 01:05:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:05:27 +0100 From: Samuel Kvasnica Message-ID: <4CEA3257.6090309@ims.co.at> In-Reply-To: <20101122003754.GE13830@dastard> References: <20101119133848.GA5471@infradead.org> References: <20101122003754.GE13830@dastard> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix exporting with left over 64-bit inodes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/22/2010 01:37 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:38:49AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> From: Samuel Kvasnica >> >> We now support mounting and using filesystems with 64-bit inodes even >> when not mounted with the inode64 option (which now only controls if >> we allocate new inodes in that space or not). Make sure we always >> use large NFS file handles when exporting a filesystem that may contain >> 64-bit inodes. Note that this only affects newly generated file handles, >> any outstanding 32-bit file handle is still accepted. >> >> [hch: the comment and commit log are mine, the rest is from a patch >> snipplet from Samuel] >> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Won't this mean that people exporting non-root directories suddenly > have those exports stop working on a kernel upgrade due to changing > the handle format? > > Cheers, > > Dave. Hello Dave, nothing is really changing, it is a bugfix. NFS was trying to use 32bit inodes which was incorrect (i.e. broken at client) for xfs filesystem containing 64bit inodes in one special case. This is fixed now. regards, Sam _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs