public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Xfs delaylog hanged up
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:36:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CEC5E15.7080307@shiftmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101123234811.0ea3c41c@galadriel.home>

On 11/23/2010 11:48 PM, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> So Spelic, you're using the 3Ware as a SATA controller, but not a RAID
> controller? This is quite unexpected, though going with md
> instead provides better IOPS.
>    

Yep, because I know MD better, I can see the code, it's more flexible 
and customizable, can be controlled with scripts more easily... Also 
parameters to the underlying drives can be controlled if I use MD, and 
it's easier to align filesystem to stripes. Also my time is better spent 
learning it as MD won't change the next time I buy a different hw 
controller.
What would be the advantage of using hardware raid?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-24  0:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-22 19:27 Xfs delaylog hanged up Spelic
2010-11-22 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 11:17   ` Spelic
2010-11-23 13:28     ` Spelic
2010-11-23 20:46     ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 22:14       ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-24  0:20         ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24 13:12           ` Spelic
2010-11-24 21:50             ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 22:48       ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-24  0:36         ` Spelic [this message]
2010-11-24  1:40           ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-24  6:18           ` Michael Monnerie
2010-11-24  7:44           ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-24  0:58       ` Spelic
2010-11-24  5:44         ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-25 23:34       ` Spelic
2010-11-26  4:20         ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24 22:52 ` Spelic
2010-11-26 22:43   ` Spelic
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-24  4:03 Richard Scobie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CEC5E15.7080307@shiftmail.org \
    --to=spelic@shiftmail.org \
    --cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox