From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oAO46D72057015 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:06:13 -0600 Received: from smtp3.clear.net.nz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E93AF1C6CC78 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:07:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.clear.net.nz (smtp3.clear.net.nz [203.97.33.64]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id di6WeeJpyerNQVzf for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:07:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [210.246.8.120] (210-246-8-120.paradise.net.nz [210.246.8.120]) by smtp3.clear.net.nz (CLEAR Net Mail) with ESMTP id <0LCD00E8VFGYXF00@smtp3.clear.net.nz> for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:07:48 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:03:45 +1300 From: Richard Scobie Subject: Re: Xfs delaylog hanged up Message-id: <4CEC8EA1.8070104@clear.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Spelic wrote: > Yep, because I know MD better, I can see the code, it's more flexible > and customizable, can be controlled with scripts more easily... Also > parameters to the underlying drives can be controlled if I use MD, and > it's easier to align filesystem to stripes. Also my time is better Slightly off topic, but your previously mentioned xfs_info shows sunit and swidth values of zero, so your filesystem is not aligned to stripes. /# xfs_info /perftest/xfs/ > meta-data=/dev/mapper/perftestvg-xfslv isize=256 agcount=16, > agsize=50331648 blks > = sectsz=512 attr=2 > data = bsize=4096 blocks=805306368, imaxpct=5 > = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks Regards, Richard _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs