From: Spelic <spelic@shiftmail.org>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Xfs delaylog hanged up
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:43:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF0380E.5000706@shiftmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CED973B.60102@shiftmail.org>
On 11/24/2010 11:52 PM, Spelic wrote:
> On 11/22/2010 08:27 PM, Spelic wrote:
>> ....
>> I was doing a parallel-kernel-unpack benchmark:
>> ....
>
> I tried to reproduce it today but unfortunately I wasn't able to, not
> even on the same hardware.
>
> The first time it happened so soon after starting such
> parallel-kernel-unpack benchmark (at the second run!) that I was
> confident it was possible to reproduce it easily, but today in many
> hours it never happened again. Sorry. Unfortunately the machine is
> going back to production soon so I'm not sure I can do further testing.
I had another smaller hangup, and unfortunately I wasn't paying
attention. I just noticed that between a zillion runs of the "benchmark"
taking 1 minute (for the part before the sync) I just had one that took
2m30s for the same part. The system was absolutely idle except that test
so I can't really see an explanation other than being another smaller
hangup...
The good news is that it definitely came out of the hangup by itself:
this time I didn't press Ctrl-C. So even if it was an xfs bug it doesn't
seem fatal.
The dmesg this time showed nothing; probably because the hangup this
time was shorter than 120 seconds so the watchdog didn't notice anything.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-22 19:27 Xfs delaylog hanged up Spelic
2010-11-22 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 11:17 ` Spelic
2010-11-23 13:28 ` Spelic
2010-11-23 20:46 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 22:14 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-24 0:20 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24 13:12 ` Spelic
2010-11-24 21:50 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-23 22:48 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-24 0:36 ` Spelic
2010-11-24 1:40 ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-11-24 6:18 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-11-24 7:44 ` Emmanuel Florac
2010-11-24 0:58 ` Spelic
2010-11-24 5:44 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-25 23:34 ` Spelic
2010-11-26 4:20 ` Dave Chinner
2010-11-24 22:52 ` Spelic
2010-11-26 22:43 ` Spelic [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-24 4:03 Richard Scobie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF0380E.5000706@shiftmail.org \
--to=spelic@shiftmail.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox