From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oB93gSHg166437 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:42:28 -0600 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 2F9B51CA8ED2 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:44:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (64-131-28-21.usfamily.net [64.131.28.21]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JEutCkHHfi6U8Bhv for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:44:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D00508E.5040408@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:44:14 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: possible xfs corruption References: <30395558.post@talk.nabble.com> <20101207221009.GA29333@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20101207221009.GA29333@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: blacknred , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 12/7/10 4:10 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:49:49AM -0800, blacknred wrote: >> >> Hi... >> >> I'm stuck with a storage issue on reboot. Initially doubted the storage, but >> dmesg throws these errors. Now wondering whether this is a fs issue? Any >> thoughts as to whats going on here? >> >> >> XFS: failed to locate log tail >> XFS: log mount/recovery failed: error 117 >> XFS: log mount failed >> XFS mounting filesystem cciss/c0d0 >> Filesystem "cciss/c0d0": XFS internal error xlog_clear_stale_blocks(2) at >> line 1237 of file > > Which indicates that the head and/or the tail of the log are not > valid. Can you provide the output of: > > # xfs_logprint -d /dev/cciss/c0d0 > > So we can see what the head/tail values are in the log? > >> /home/buildsvn/rpmbuild/BUILD/xfs-kmod-0.4/_kmod_build_PAE/xfs_log_recover.c. > > CentOS kernel? How old? Assuning it's centos5, there's really no need to be using an xfs kmod there anymore, the module shipped with the kernel in recent versions of the OS is really the one you want to use. That kmod is ancient and unmaintained. Although I suspect the storage is more likely at fault here. :) -Eric > Cheers, > > Dave. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs