From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oBNF0biv189897 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:00:37 -0600 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 35FBD21B9AC for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:02:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (64-131-28-21.usfamily.net [64.131.28.21]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gzxMSkzffRIRB5QE for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:02:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D13648B.8000105@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:02:35 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: no rw xfs file systems in mtab: /proc/mounts References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Honza Fikar Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 12/23/10 6:32 AM, Honza Fikar wrote: > Hi guys, > > when I try "xfs_fsr -v -d" on my two computers, it says now: > > no rw xfs file systems in mtab: /proc/mounts hm that's a little confusing, what it means is it looked in /proc/mounts and did not find anything, or so it thought. As a result of: 89e4b5bd5615edc584a5111c86f12b4f89f8dd7d xfs_fsr: use /proc/mounts if available What does your /proc/mounts show? -Eric > while actually there is the LUKS encrypted root: > ... > /dev/mapper/root / xfs > rw,noatime,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,noquota 0 0 > ... > > on the third computer it works as expected, there are two xfs file > systems, one of them LUKS encrypted: > ... > /dev/root / xfs > rw,noatime,attr2,delaylog,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,noquota 0 0 > /dev/mapper/encrypted /home xfs > rw,noatime,attr2,delaylog,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=256k,sunit=512,swidth=1536,noquota > 0 0 > ... > > and it was working some time ago on all the three computers > > distribution gentoo > xfsprogs 3.1.4, but I just tried git version and it's the same > kernel 2.6.32, on the third machine 2.6.35 > > Best regards, > Honza > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs