From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id oBNNkc33015437 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:46:39 -0600 Received: from smtp3.clear.net.nz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 0488E147EB4F for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:48:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.clear.net.nz (smtp3.clear.net.nz [203.97.33.64]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id bH6F0ySMlUOIrtTe for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:48:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [210.246.8.113] (210-246-8-113.paradise.net.nz [210.246.8.113]) by smtp3.clear.net.nz (CLEAR Net Mail) with ESMTP id <0LDW00F8ZNGZW900@smtp3.clear.net.nz> for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:48:36 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:47:42 +1300 From: Richard Scobie Subject: Re: able to mount a fs, unable to repair it Message-id: <4D13DF9E.4090507@clear.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Emmanuel Florac wrote: > However, a reliable RAID-5 is probably safer than an experimental > RAID-6 overall. Looking at the 2.6.29.1 kernel running on this machine, the only md RAID mode marked as experimental is RAID-10. I have no experience using Xen, but have used md RAID6 extensively in heavily loaded situations for over three years without problems. Regards, Richard _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs