public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:49:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D40EB2F.2050809@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110127033011.GH21311@dastard>

On 11-01-26 10:30 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [Please cc xfs@oss.sgi.com on XFS bug reports. Added.]
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> Alex / Christoph,
>>
>> My mythtv box here uses XFS on a 2TB drive for storing recordings and videos.
>> It is behaving rather strangely though, and has gotten worse recently.
>> Here is what I see happening:
>>
>> The drive mounts fine at boot, but the very first attempt to write a new file
>> to the filesystem suffers from a very very long pause, 30-60 seconds, during which
>> time the disk activity light is fully "on".
>
> Please post the output of xfs_info <mtpt> so we can see what you
> filesystem configuration is.

   /dev/sdb1 on /var/lib/mythtv type xfs
(rw,noatime,allocsize=64M,logbufs=8,largeio)

   [~] xfs_info /var/lib/mythtv
   meta-data=/dev/sdb1              isize=256    agcount=7453, agsize=65536 blks
            =                       sectsz=512   attr=2
   data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=488378638, imaxpct=5
            =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
   naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
   log      =internal               bsize=4096   blocks=32768, version=2
            =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
   realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

>> This happens only on the first new file write after mounting.
>> From then on, the filesystem is fast and responsive as expected.
>> If I umount the filesystem, and then mount it again,
>> the exact same behaviour can be observed.
>
> I can't say I've seen this. Can you capture a blktrace of the IO so
> we can see what IO is actually being done, and perhaps also record
> an XFS event trace as well (i.e. of all the events in
> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/xfs).

I'll have to reconfig/rebuild the kernel to include support for blktrace first.
Can you specify the exact commands/args you'd like for running blktrace etc?

>> This of course screws up mythtv, as it causes me to lose the first 30-60
>> seconds of the first recording it attempts after booting.  So as a workaround
>> I now have a startup script to create, sync, and delete a 64MB file before
>> starting mythtv.  This still takes 30-60 seconds, but it all happens and
>> finishes before mythtv has a real-time need to write to the filesystem.
>>
>> The 2TB drive is fine -- zero errors, no events in the SMART logs,
>> and I've disabled the silly WD head-unload logic on it.
>>
>> What's happening here?  Why the big long burst of activity?
>> I've only just noticed this behaviour in the past few weeks,
>> running 2.6.35 and more recently 2.6.37.
>
> Can you be a bit more precise? what were you running before 2.6.35
> when you didn't notice this?

Those details are in my earlier follow-up posting.

>> The other issue is something I notice at umount time.

I'm going to let that issue rest for now,
until we figure out the first issue.
Heck, they might even be the exact same thing.. :)

Thanks!

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-27  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4D40C8D1.8090202@teksavvy.com>
2011-01-27  3:30 ` xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount Dave Chinner
2011-01-27  3:49   ` Mark Lord [this message]
2011-01-27  5:17     ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-27 15:12     ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 15:40       ` Justin Piszcz
2011-01-27 16:03         ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 19:40           ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-27 20:11             ` david
2011-01-27 23:53               ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-28  2:09                 ` david
2011-01-28 13:56                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 19:26                     ` david
2011-01-29  5:40                       ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-29  6:08                         ` david
2011-01-29  7:35                           ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-31 19:17                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-27 21:56             ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28  0:17               ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28  1:22                 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28  1:36                   ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28  4:14                   ` David Rees
2011-01-28 14:22                     ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28  7:31                   ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 14:33                     ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 23:58                       ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 19:18             ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-01-27 20:24           ` John Stoffel
2011-01-27 23:41       ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28  0:59         ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 23:39     ` Dave Chinner
     [not found] ` <4D40CDCF.4010301@teksavvy.com>
2011-01-27  3:43   ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-27  3:53     ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27  4:54       ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 23:34       ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D40EB2F.2050809@teksavvy.com \
    --to=kernel@teksavvy.com \
    --cc=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox