From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:49:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D40EB2F.2050809@teksavvy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110127033011.GH21311@dastard>
On 11-01-26 10:30 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [Please cc xfs@oss.sgi.com on XFS bug reports. Added.]
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:22:25PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> Alex / Christoph,
>>
>> My mythtv box here uses XFS on a 2TB drive for storing recordings and videos.
>> It is behaving rather strangely though, and has gotten worse recently.
>> Here is what I see happening:
>>
>> The drive mounts fine at boot, but the very first attempt to write a new file
>> to the filesystem suffers from a very very long pause, 30-60 seconds, during which
>> time the disk activity light is fully "on".
>
> Please post the output of xfs_info <mtpt> so we can see what you
> filesystem configuration is.
/dev/sdb1 on /var/lib/mythtv type xfs
(rw,noatime,allocsize=64M,logbufs=8,largeio)
[~] xfs_info /var/lib/mythtv
meta-data=/dev/sdb1 isize=256 agcount=7453, agsize=65536 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2
data = bsize=4096 blocks=488378638, imaxpct=5
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>> This happens only on the first new file write after mounting.
>> From then on, the filesystem is fast and responsive as expected.
>> If I umount the filesystem, and then mount it again,
>> the exact same behaviour can be observed.
>
> I can't say I've seen this. Can you capture a blktrace of the IO so
> we can see what IO is actually being done, and perhaps also record
> an XFS event trace as well (i.e. of all the events in
> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/xfs).
I'll have to reconfig/rebuild the kernel to include support for blktrace first.
Can you specify the exact commands/args you'd like for running blktrace etc?
>> This of course screws up mythtv, as it causes me to lose the first 30-60
>> seconds of the first recording it attempts after booting. So as a workaround
>> I now have a startup script to create, sync, and delete a 64MB file before
>> starting mythtv. This still takes 30-60 seconds, but it all happens and
>> finishes before mythtv has a real-time need to write to the filesystem.
>>
>> The 2TB drive is fine -- zero errors, no events in the SMART logs,
>> and I've disabled the silly WD head-unload logic on it.
>>
>> What's happening here? Why the big long burst of activity?
>> I've only just noticed this behaviour in the past few weeks,
>> running 2.6.35 and more recently 2.6.37.
>
> Can you be a bit more precise? what were you running before 2.6.35
> when you didn't notice this?
Those details are in my earlier follow-up posting.
>> The other issue is something I notice at umount time.
I'm going to let that issue rest for now,
until we figure out the first issue.
Heck, they might even be the exact same thing.. :)
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4D40C8D1.8090202@teksavvy.com>
2011-01-27 3:30 ` xfs: very slow after mount, very slow at umount Dave Chinner
2011-01-27 3:49 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2011-01-27 5:17 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-27 15:12 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 15:40 ` Justin Piszcz
2011-01-27 16:03 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 19:40 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-27 20:11 ` david
2011-01-27 23:53 ` Stan Hoeppner
2011-01-28 2:09 ` david
2011-01-28 13:56 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 19:26 ` david
2011-01-29 5:40 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-29 6:08 ` david
2011-01-29 7:35 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-31 19:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-01-27 21:56 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 1:22 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 1:36 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 4:14 ` David Rees
2011-01-28 14:22 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 7:31 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 14:33 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-28 23:58 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 19:18 ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-01-27 20:24 ` John Stoffel
2011-01-27 23:41 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-28 0:59 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 23:39 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <4D40CDCF.4010301@teksavvy.com>
2011-01-27 3:43 ` Dave Chinner
2011-01-27 3:53 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 4:54 ` Mark Lord
2011-01-27 23:34 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D40EB2F.2050809@teksavvy.com \
--to=kernel@teksavvy.com \
--cc=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox