From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p13Eel61186678 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:40:47 -0600 Received: from mout.perfora.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 549884FDDD8 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 06:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ye7tjEn8gVfhVBl3 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:43:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D4ABEF7.7000400@lueckdatasystems.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:43:03 -0500 From: Michael Lueck MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22, how could this IRIX bug get into Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid between kernels 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26? References: <4D49A35B.6030009@sgi.com> <20110203045836.GV11040@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20110203045836.GV11040@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Dann Frazier Dave Chinner wrote: > So bulkstat got EINVAL returned for and inode that it was looking > up. That implies that it was racing with an unlink, which is > what the above commits catch and prevent. Can you run xfsdump with > full debug output (-v 5) so we can see what inode is being operated > on when this failure occurs? Thank you so much Dave! Please find the trace output here in zipped format: http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/pub/ldsbackup.trace.log.zip I chose to trace the "data" backup that actually had some size to it. Sincerely, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs