From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p13EnV9C188175 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:49:31 -0600 Received: from mout.perfora.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id CE4ED1550A37 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 06:51:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id r6TJozrzhGUxoAXy for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:51:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D4AC105.1090804@lueckdatasystems.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:51:49 -0500 From: Michael Lueck MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22, how could this IRIX bug get into Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid between kernels 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26? References: <4D49A35B.6030009@sgi.com> <20110203045836.GV11040@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20110203045836.GV11040@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Dann Frazier Greetings Dave- BTW: I ended up testing with the latest 10.04 kernel. The size diffrerence of both kernel packages is disturbing! -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 31608926 2011-01-11 13:09 linux-image-2.6.32-28-generic-pae_2.6.32-28.55_i386.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4160 2010-11-08 05:05 linux-image-generic-pae_2.6.32.26.28_i386.deb Perhaps that is due to the only change-log entry that came through apticron to me that "bump kernel number in prep for xyz" type of a change comment. Sincerely, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs