public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: kernel panic - stack-protector: kernel stack is corrupted in: f87aca93
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:32:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6C4CC5.5030909@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D6C45EE.80203@mnsu.edu>

On 2/28/11 7:03 PM, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
> Sadly, I didn't have the vmlinux file around anymore.  I'll be glad to recreate it when I get in tomorrow.  However, I have revered commit 3a3675b7f23f83ca8c67c9c2b6edf707fd28d1ba and the problem seems to have vanished.  I'm guessing the stack at this point is a little to fragile for a memset.  The patch is:

Ok, no worries, if the below commit is the culprit for sure, that's enough...

So, whoopsies.

STATIC int
xfs_ioc_fsgeometry_v1(
        xfs_mount_t             *mp,
        void                    __user *arg)
{
        xfs_fsop_geom_v1_t      fsgeo;
        int                     error;

        error = xfs_fs_geometry(mp, (xfs_fsop_geom_t *)&fsgeo, 3);

what we really have is an xfs_fsop_geom_v1_t, but cast to a xfs_fsop_geom_t.

xfs_fs_geometry() zeroes it out to the tune of sizeof (xfs_fsop_geom_t)

the latter is bigger, with the addition of

	__u32           logsunit;

so we overwrite memory that's not ours.  :(  Seems like we should zero
in the callers, when we know how much is really on the stack.  I'll follow
up with a patch; pity this one was fast-tracked for security, I think :(

-Eric



> 
> commit 3a3675b7f23f83ca8c67c9c2b6edf707fd28d1ba
> Author: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
> Date:   Mon Feb 14 13:45:28 2011 +0000
> 
>     xfs: prevent leaking uninitialized stack memory in FSGEOMETRY_V1
> 
>     The FSGEOMETRY_V1 ioctl (and its compat equivalent) calls out to
>     xfs_fs_geometry() with a version number of 3.  This code path does not
>     fill in the logsunit member of the passed xfs_fsop_geom_t, leading to
>     the leaking of four bytes of uninitialized stack data to potentially
>     unprivileged callers.
> 
>     v2 switches to memset() to avoid future issues if structure members
>     change, on suggestion of Dave Chinner.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@kernel.org>
>     Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
> 
> diff --git b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> index cec89dd..85668ef 100644
> --- b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> +++ a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ xfs_fs_geometry(
>         xfs_fsop_geom_t         *geo,
>         int                     new_version)
>  {
> +
> +       memset(geo, 0, sizeof(*geo));
> +
>         geo->blocksize = mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
>         geo->rtextsize = mp->m_sb.sb_rextsize;
>         geo->agblocks = mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks;

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-01  1:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-28 22:58 kernel panic - stack-protector: kernel stack is corrupted in: f87aca93 Jeffrey Hundstad
2011-03-01  0:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-03-01  1:03   ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2011-03-01  1:32     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2011-03-01  2:57       ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-01  1:37 ` [PATCH] xfs: zero proper structure size for geometry calls Eric Sandeen
2011-03-01  2:59   ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-01  3:01     ` Eric Sandeen
2011-03-01  6:59   ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2011-03-01 12:55     ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-03-01 15:36       ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2011-03-01 15:49         ` Eric Sandeen
2011-03-01 17:50           ` [PATCH, V3 (sort of)] " Alex Elder
2011-03-01 18:18             ` Eric Sandeen
2011-03-01 21:40               ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2011-03-02  0:02             ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D6C4CC5.5030909@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox