* xfsprogs
@ 2011-04-07 16:04 stress_buster
2011-04-07 17:22 ` xfsprogs Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: stress_buster @ 2011-04-07 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-xfs
Hi,
My xfs_repair is bit old- 2.9. version.
I'm considering installing latest available. But just worried because this
is my production server and has some custom apps built into my OS.
Is upgrading xfs_repair a high risk?
Also do I need to install latest xfsprogs or anyway only to upgrade
xfs_repair from the package?
I'm only would need xfs_repair mostly, so doesnt matter to me leaving
others-mkfs.xfs etc in xfsprogs at the old version if that minimises the
risk...
Any thoughts?
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/xfsprogs-tp31342497p31342497.html
Sent from the linux-xfs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: xfsprogs
2011-04-07 16:04 xfsprogs stress_buster
@ 2011-04-07 17:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-12 9:26 ` xfsprogs Leo Davis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2011-04-07 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stress_buster; +Cc: linux-xfs
On 4/7/11 9:04 AM, stress_buster wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My xfs_repair is bit old- 2.9. version.
> I'm considering installing latest available. But just worried because this
> is my production server and has some custom apps built into my OS.
>
> Is upgrading xfs_repair a high risk?
No.
> Also do I need to install latest xfsprogs or anyway only to upgrade
> xfs_repair from the package?
> I'm only would need xfs_repair mostly, so doesnt matter to me leaving
> others-mkfs.xfs etc in xfsprogs at the old version if that minimises the
> risk...
if you really want to try newer xfs_repair only, just build an xfsprogs tree and run from inside the tree.
> Any thoughts?
Just upgrade. ;)
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: xfsprogs
2011-04-07 17:22 ` xfsprogs Eric Sandeen
@ 2011-04-12 9:26 ` Leo Davis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leo Davis @ 2011-04-12 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: linux-xfs
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 925 bytes --]
Thank you very much :)
________________________________
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: stress_buster <leo1783@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:52:19 PM
Subject: Re: xfsprogs
On 4/7/11 9:04 AM, stress_buster wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My xfs_repair is bit old- 2.9. version.
> I'm considering installing latest available. But just worried because this
> is my production server and has some custom apps built into my OS.
>
> Is upgrading xfs_repair a high risk?
No.
> Also do I need to install latest xfsprogs or anyway only to upgrade
> xfs_repair from the package?
> I'm only would need xfs_repair mostly, so doesnt matter to me leaving
> others-mkfs.xfs etc in xfsprogs at the old version if that minimises the
> risk...
if you really want to try newer xfs_repair only, just build an xfsprogs tree and
run from inside the tree.
> Any thoughts?
Just upgrade. ;)
-Eric
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1689 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-12 9:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-07 16:04 xfsprogs stress_buster
2011-04-07 17:22 ` xfsprogs Eric Sandeen
2011-04-12 9:26 ` xfsprogs Leo Davis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox