From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with SMTP id p37HJ5rB120310 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:19:05 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with SMTP id 759BB1E0786D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with SMTP id gnuESEHwtjxJr3ZU for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D9DF2CB.1020503@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:22:19 -0700 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfsprogs References: <31342497.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <31342497.post@talk.nabble.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: stress_buster Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On 4/7/11 9:04 AM, stress_buster wrote: > > Hi, > > My xfs_repair is bit old- 2.9. version. > I'm considering installing latest available. But just worried because this > is my production server and has some custom apps built into my OS. > > Is upgrading xfs_repair a high risk? No. > Also do I need to install latest xfsprogs or anyway only to upgrade > xfs_repair from the package? > I'm only would need xfs_repair mostly, so doesnt matter to me leaving > others-mkfs.xfs etc in xfsprogs at the old version if that minimises the > risk... if you really want to try newer xfs_repair only, just build an xfsprogs tree and run from inside the tree. > Any thoughts? Just upgrade. ;) -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs