public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	coreutils@gnu.org, Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>,
	xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Files full of zeros with coreutils-8.11 and xfs (FIEMAP related?)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:29:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA7836A.5040604@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110414225904.GK21395@dastard>

On 14/04/11 23:59, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:50:10AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 4/14/11 9:59 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> On 14/04/11 15:02, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Pádraig,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> here you go:
>>>>>> + filefrag -v unwritten.withdata                                                                                                                     
>>>>>> Filesystem type is: ef53                                                                                                                             
>>>>>> File size of unwritten.withdata is 5120 (2 blocks, blocksize 4096)                                                                                   
>>>>>>  ext logical physical expected length flags                                                                                                          
>>>>>>    0       0   274432            2560 unwritten,eof                                                                                                  
>>>>>> unwritten.withdata: 1 extent found
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please notice that this also happens with ext4 on the same kernel. 
>>>>>> Btrfs is fine.
>>>>>
>>>> `filefrag -vs` fixes the issue on both xfs and ext4.
>>>
>>> So in summary, currently on (2.6.39-rc3), the following
>>> will (usually?) report a single unwritten extent,
>>> on both ext4 and xfs
>>>
>>>   fallocate -l 10MiB -n k
>>>   dd count=10 if=/dev/urandom conv=notrunc iflag=fullblock of=k
>>>   filefrag -v k # grep for an extent without unwritten || fail
>>
>> right, that's what I see too in testing.
>>
>> But would the coreutils install have done a preallocation of the destination file?
>>
>> Otherwise this looks like a different bug...
>>
>>> This particular issue has been discussed so far at:
>>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8411
>>> Note there it was stated there that ext4 had this
>>> fixed as of 2.6.39-rc1, so maybe there is something lurking?
>>
>> ext4 got a fix, but not xfs, I guess.  My poor brain can't remember, I think I started looking into it, but it's clearly still broken.
>>
>> Still, I don't know for sure what happened to Markus - did something preallocate, in his case?
> 
> Unwritten extent mapping behaves in an unexpected way due to
> buffered writeback not occurring immediately. Extent conversion
> doesn't occur until the data is on disk, and for buffered IO you
> need an fdatasync to ensure that has occurred.
> 
> That is: 
> 
> $ xfs_io -f -c "resvsp 0 10m" -c "pwrite 0 5120" -c "bmap -vp" /mnt/test/foo
> wrote 5120/5120 bytes at offset 0
> 5 KiB, 2 ops; 0.0000 sec (62.600 MiB/sec and 25641.0256 ops/sec)
> /mnt/test/foo:
>  EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      AG AG-OFFSET        TOTAL FLAGS
>    0: [0..20479]:      268984..289463    0 (268984..289463) 20480 10000
> 
> Data has not been written yet, so it is still unwritten. The same
> test with a fsync shows:
> 
> $ sudo xfs_io -f -c "resvsp 0 10m" -c "pwrite 0 5120" -c fsync -c "bmap -vp" /mnt/test/foo
> wrote 5120/5120 bytes at offset 0
> 5 KiB, 2 ops; 0.0000 sec (87.193 MiB/sec and 35714.2857 ops/sec)
> /mnt/test/foo:
>  EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      AG AG-OFFSET        TOTAL FLAGS
>    0: [0..15]:         268984..268999    0 (268984..268999)    16 00000
>    1: [16..20479]:     269000..289463    0 (269000..289463) 20464 10000
> 
> Everything is fine.
> 
> So this seems like an application error to me. If you are going to
> use fiemap to determine what ranges to copy, then you have to
> fdatasync the source file first to guarantee that preallocated
> extents have been converted to written state before mapping the
> file....

Well IMHO there should be a difference between
knowing where you are going to write, and actually writing to disk.
I.E. one shouldn't need to write the whole way to the device
before returning a valid fiemap.  If a particular file system
implementation needs to sync to return a valid fiemap,
then it should be implicit.

cheers,
Pádraig.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-14 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-14 10:26 Files full of zeros with coreutils-8.11 and xfs (FIEMAP related?) Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-14 12:06 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-14 14:02   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-14 14:59     ` Pádraig Brady
2011-04-14 15:50       ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-14 15:52         ` Pádraig Brady
2011-04-14 15:56           ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-14 16:03             ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-14 16:14               ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-14 16:21               ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-04-14 16:28                 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-14 16:31                   ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-14 16:48                     ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-04-14 16:49                       ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-14 16:04             ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-04-14 16:10               ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-05-05 11:29                 ` Pádraig Brady
2011-05-05 11:47                   ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-04-14 17:27           ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-14 19:13             ` Pádraig Brady
2011-04-14 19:39             ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-14 22:59         ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-14 23:29           ` Pádraig Brady [this message]
2011-04-15  0:09             ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-15  5:01               ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-16  0:50                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-16  5:11                   ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-16 12:21                     ` Theodore Tso
2011-04-18  0:40                       ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-18  2:45                         ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-19  1:58                           ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-04-19  2:59                             ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-19  3:05                               ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-21 20:12                                 ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-19  3:30                               ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-04-19  4:14                               ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19  5:27                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-19  3:44                             ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19  6:53                               ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-04-19  7:45                                 ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-19  8:11                                   ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-04-19 14:05                                     ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-19 14:09                                   ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-19 14:13                                     ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-19 16:01                                       ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-20  1:53                                         ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-04-20 15:21                                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-20 17:21                                           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-19 21:08                                     ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-20 15:29                                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-16  6:05                   ` Yongqiang Yang
2011-04-18  0:35                     ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-15  8:53               ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-15 17:16                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 17:24                   ` Eric Blake
2011-04-15 17:26                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-04-15 22:28                       ` Andreas Dilger
2011-04-16  0:25                         ` Dave Chinner
2011-04-14 14:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2011-04-20 14:39 ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-21 20:01   ` Jim Meyering

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DA7836A.5040604@draigBrady.com \
    --to=p@draigbrady.com \
    --cc=coreutils@gnu.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox