From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	p3M5o0v4200796 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:50:00 -0500
Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1C65C132F561
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net
	[65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Ui8aV2ERk97emBPd
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.100.53] (gffx.hardwarefreak.com [192.168.100.53])
	by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9F26C12C
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:53:27 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4DB117D7.4020307@hardwarefreak.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:53:27 -0500
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: 2.6.39 delaylog default mount status
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

If already asked and answered, my apologies.

Is delaylog still on track to be the default in 2.6.39?

-- 
Stan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs