From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p4HEW9l3188472 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 09:32:09 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E242415D4A06 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 07:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id SbVcbdKZfhly6DKc for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 07:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DD286E5.8090105@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:32:05 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfstests: device busy when umount References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Yongqiang Yang Cc: Ext4 Developers List , Amir Goldstein , xfs-oss On 5/17/11 4:03 AM, Yongqiang Yang wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that all tests which contain 'device busy' errors have > falloc operations. Does the error have something to do with falloc? > cc'ing xfs list since xfs devs maintain xfstests. What tests have "device busy" errors? What do the usual investigative steps such as "lsof" and "fuser" tell you when this happens? Are there loop devices that didn't get cleaned up, or processes that have not terminated? What tests have these problems? -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs