From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p56Hfqq3241457 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:41:52 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C3A561E3FDE3 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com (e2.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.142]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id bsahIFHLiYH1GNxr for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (d01relay07.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.147]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p56HLTRA009057 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:21:29 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay07.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p56Hfi5B446596 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:41:45 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p56HfimR002765 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:41:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4DED1155.4060503@vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 10:41:41 -0700 From: Allison Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Fwd: [XFSTEST Add Fallocate Punch Hole Tests 1/3 v4] Add Punch Hole to FSX References: <4DE93268.90007@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110606150323.GB22236@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20110606150323.GB22236@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-fsdevel , xfs-oss , Ext4 Developers List , Allison Henderson On 06/06/2011 08:03 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Btw, you mails are basically unreadable to me. There doesn't seem to be > any threading context, and they all have your reply on top with a full > quote. Please try again with a submission from a saner mailer, and all > important context information included in the [PATCH 0/n] mail. Sorry about that, does this reply look better? I realized that I needed to send the patch to more lists than just xfs, so I forwarded the set and the discussions. I think the forwarding might have been what broke the threading, and I can turn off the full quote. If this reply looks ok, I can resend the set and just collapse down the questions into a [PATCH 0/n] email. Thx! _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs