From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p57CwbFs025077 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 07:58:38 -0500 Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id AA2551664109 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 05:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (server655-han.de-nserver.de [85.158.177.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id U9jxHLv7WHOs9KBG for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2011 05:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DEE2078.3010102@profihost.ag> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:58:32 +0200 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect References: <4DEE0EA4.9090002@profihost.ag> <20110607115441.GA4653@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20110607115441.GA4653@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com >> it seems that a bug was backported into the latest 2.6.32 longterm >> stable kernel. Now the patch "XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes >> is incorrect" needs to get backported to 2.6.32. >> >> Who can help? Who is responsible? > > For -stable releases no one really is. If you want to help you can > backport it and send it to the stable mailinglist. Sorry i can't. I'm not a kernel hacker. But i think a real bug / showstopper should be fixed in a longterm stable kernel. Redhat seems to have fixed it on it's own: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642680 Sadly they haven't provided a patch. Greets Stefan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs