From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p63Fx62m044157 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 10:59:06 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 39E10498E8 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 08:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id TsGEWKAXBTXHeEQi for ; Sun, 03 Jul 2011 08:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E1091C7.5040906@sandeen.net> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:59:03 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs_growfs doesn't resize References: <47455.1309470147@sonic.net> In-Reply-To: <47455.1309470147@sonic.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: kkeller@sonic.net Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 6/30/11 4:42 PM, kkeller@sonic.net wrote: > # uname -a > Linux sahara.xxx 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 09:10:25 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Yes, it's not a completely current kernel. This box is running CentOS 5 > with some yum updates. try # rpm -qa | grep xfs If you see anything with "kmod" you're running an exceptionally old xfs codebase. 2.6.18-138 and beyond should have a newer xfs backport built into the kernel rpm itself, as shipped from Red Hat. But the ancient xfs-kmod (or similar) provided xfs.ko will take precedence even if you update that kernel. * Fri Apr 03 2009 Don Zickus [2.6.18-138.el5] ... - [fs] xfs: update to 2.6.28.6 codebase (Eric Sandeen ) [470845] If at all possible I'd try an updated kernel, especially if your xfs.ko is provided by the very, very, very old centos xfs-kmod rpm. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs