From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p6SHpx69004592 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:52:00 -0500 Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D6D1F10B3DA5 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.161]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PfAMUz8iCVAkqU9B for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E31A19E.3040404@giantdisaster.de> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:51:26 +0200 From: Stefan Behrens MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfstests: Add support for btrfs in 062 References: <20110728084504.GA3407@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20110728084504.GA3407@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On 7/28/2011 10:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:27:58AM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote: >> Added btrfs to the list of supported filesystems for this test. >> Remove output of mkfs since this is specific to mkfs.xfs and now filtered >> out. > > Why can't it be generic? Any reason this one doesn't work on e.g. ext2 > or reiserfs? The only reason for not making the tests 015, 062, 083, 117, 120 and 192 "_supported_fs generic" was to keep the effect of the changes minimal. But I agree that they are generic ones and I have now changed it accordingly in the revised patch series that I will send soon. Thanks for your comments! _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs