From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p7KFZUYW160436 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:35:30 -0500 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 80E9915FECC4 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oAYmCbPH80XuCffP for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E4FD48B.8030101@oracle.com> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 08:36:43 -0700 From: Sunil Mushran MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags References: <1309275199-10801-1-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com> <4E4F814B.5070202@gmail.com> <4E4F865B.2010608@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4E4F865B.2010608@gmail.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Marco Stornelli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik , xfs@oss.sgi.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On 08/20/2011 03:03 AM, Marco Stornelli wrote: > Il 20/08/2011 11:41, Marco Stornelli ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> Il 28/06/2011 17:33, Josef Bacik ha scritto: >>> This just gets us ready to support the SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags. >>> Turns out >>> using fiemap in things like cp cause more problems than it solves, so >>> lets try >>> and give userspace an interface that doesn't suck. We need to match >>> solaris >>> here, and the definitions are >>> >>> *o* If /whence/ is SEEK_HOLE, the offset of the start of the >>> next hole greater than or equal to the supplied offset >>> is returned. The definition of a hole is provided near >>> the end of the DESCRIPTION. >>> >>> *o* If /whence/ is SEEK_DATA, the file pointer is set to the >>> start of the next non-hole file region greater than or >>> equal to the supplied offset. >>> >> >> I'm implementing the SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE management for pramfs and I've >> got some doubts about the right behavior: >> >> 1) when we use SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE, the offset used in lseek means >> always the offset from the start of the file, right? >> >> 2) in case of a file with hole at the beginning and data at the end, if >> I do lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_HOLE) I should receive the end of the file >> because the idea is to search the *next* hole and we have always a >> virtual hole at the end of the file, right? > > Just to be precise about this question: the alternative here, it's to > return the same position because we are already in a hole. Yes, the offset is from the start of the file. And yes, same offset is ok. I think the word next should be dropped from the definition. It is misleading. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs