From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p8E8nORb129427 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 03:49:24 -0500 Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7EB1E1527157 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (server655-han.de-nserver.de [85.158.177.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id pki6F7SwNI63JtFU for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E706A90.9080200@profihost.ag> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:49:20 +0200 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs deadlock in stable kernel 3.0.4 References: <1D2B34A7-7BB9-4E4E-9CA2-382C210E125F@profihost.ag> <20110912152133.GA8345@infradead.org> <20110912200543.GA22409@infradead.org> <4E6EF274.7050007@profihost.ag> <20110913205018.GA8543@infradead.org> <4E70571A.80108@profihost.ag> <4E705C42.6020909@profihost.ag> In-Reply-To: <4E705C42.6020909@profihost.ag> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com" , aelder@sgi.com, "xfs@oss.sgi.com" Hi, Am 14.09.2011 09:48, schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG: > Hi, > >>> Oops, that's a bug that I actually introduced myself. Fix below: >> >> Thanks for the patch. >> >> Now we have the following situation: >> >> 1.) Systems running fine with 2.6.32, 2.6.38 and with 3.1 rc-6 + patch >> 2.) Sadly it does not run with 3.0.4 for more than 1 hour. And 3.0.X >> will become the next long term stable. So there will be a lot of people >> using it. >> 3.) I have seen this deadlock on systems with aacraid and with intel >> ahci onboard. (that's all we're using) >> 4.) I still write to other devices / raids on the same controller while >> the XFS root filesystem hangs. > > Sadly it was now crashing with 3.1 rc-6 + patch again. Sorry i was to > fast to write you an email. So might it be that the problem at least in 3.1 lies in: [] ? mark_held_locks+0xc9/0xef [] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3f/0x47 and not in XFS? Stefan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs