From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p8EEv9uD146509 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:57:09 -0500 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 72EA21611D9 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Fht7fumvJlxfB4G7 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E70C0C5.1080100@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:57:09 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs_repair segfaut in stage 6 References: <4E69D1B9.8070201@nasza-klasa.pl> <201109091401.31422@zmi.at> <4E6A2B73.50503@nasza-klasa.pl> <20110912161215.GA17798@infradead.org> <4E707624.9030703@nasza-klasa.pl> <20110914142430.GA28049@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20110914142430.GA28049@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Bartosz Cisek , Michael Monnerie , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 9/14/11 9:24 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:38:44AM +0200, Bartosz Cisek wrote: >> W dniu 12.09.2011 18:12, Christoph Hellwig pisze: >>> I've repaired the image fine using xfs_repair from the Debian testing >>> xfsprogs 3.1.5+nmu1 package. It found two invalid blocks in a >>> directory, which look like the result from the hardware error you saw. >>> >>> You should be able to just rebuild the current xfsprogs (from >>> testing/unstable or git) on Lenny and get the same result. >> >> I've build xfs_repair from git on lenny and got segfault before my first >> email to this list (please refer to first email in this thread) :) > > Ooops. > >> What else I can do to find what differ our two cases? > > The hardware? Given that you were getting read I/O errors from the > hardware when shutting the fs down you probably got those as well when > running repair and that caused the segfault. Can you run xfs_repair > under gdb for me, that is: > > gdb /path/to.xfs_repair > > (gdb) set args /dev/cciss/c0d5p1 > (gdb) run > > and see what backtrace it gives you? > > Please make sure to build xfs_repair in the git tree manually using > make and not the Debian packaging, as that removes the debug symbols. > > You can run gdb on the xfs_repair binary just built in the tree, no > need to install it first. If it worked for Christoph and not for Bartosz .... Is the -DDEBUG / -DNDEBUG type setting the same in both cases? Maybe Fedora is the only one doing -DNDEBUG :( but maybe worth checking. -Eric > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs