public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfs: revert to using a kthread for AIL pushing
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:16:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9EB187.40306@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010055546.GA1641@x4.trippels.de>

> On 2011.10.10 at 12:45 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 02:33:00PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Currently we have a few issues with the way the workqueue code is used to
>>> implement AIL pushing:
>>>
>>>   - it accidentally uses the same workqueue as the syncer action, and thus
>>>     can be prevented from running if there are enough sync actions active
>>>     in the system.
>>>   - it doesn't use the HIGHPRI flag to queue at the head of the queue of
>>>     work items
>>>
>>> At this point I'm not confident enough in getting all the workqueue flags and
>>> tweaks right to provide a perfectly reliable execution context for AIL
>>> pushing, which is the most important piece in XFS to make forward progress
>>> when the log fills.
>>>
>>> Revert back to use a kthread per filesystem which fixes all the above issues
>>> at the cost of having a task struct and stack around for each mounted
>>> filesystem.  In addition this also gives us much better ways to diagnose
>>> any issues involving hung AIL pushing and removes a small amount of code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de>
>>> Reported-by: Stefan Priebe<s.priebe@profihost.ag>
>>> Tested-by: Stefan Priebe<s.priebe@profihost.ag>
>>
>> I'd much prefer to fix the problems with the workqueue usage than
>> revert back to using a thread, but seeing as I cannot reproduce the
>> hangs I can't really track down whatever problem there is. So,
>> a bit reluctantly:

Any news on this problem? What happens with the next long term stable 
kernel 3.0.X? How do you proceed with this bug?

Stefan

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-19 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-06 18:32 [PATCH 0/4] fix AIL pushing under heavy concurrent metadata loads Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-06 18:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: do not update xa_last_pushed_lsn for locked items Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 22:18   ` Alex Elder
2011-10-10  1:37   ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-06 18:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: force the log if we encounter pinned buffers in .iop_pushbuf Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 22:18   ` Alex Elder
2011-10-10  1:39   ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-06 18:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: revert to using a kthread for AIL pushing Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 22:18   ` Alex Elder
2011-10-10  1:45   ` Dave Chinner
2011-10-10  5:55     ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-10-10  6:06       ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-10-10 13:26       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-10 18:37         ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 11:16       ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [this message]
2011-10-19 11:34         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-19 13:10           ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-10-06 18:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: add AIL pushing tracepoints Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 22:18   ` Alex Elder
2011-10-10  1:45   ` Dave Chinner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-11 15:14 [PATCH 0/4] fix AIL pushing under heavy concurrent metadata loads V2 Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-11 15:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: revert to using a kthread for AIL pushing Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E9EB187.40306@profihost.ag \
    --to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox