From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9JDA83v188733 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:10:08 -0500 Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8904C16C26DF for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server655-han.de-nserver.de (server655-han.de-nserver.de [85.158.177.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id C4FHdOgARp6qpeM8 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9ECC2C.5050700@profihost.ag> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:10:04 +0200 From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfs: revert to using a kthread for AIL pushing References: <20111006183257.036884724@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111006183549.770414484@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111010014509.GT3159@dastard> <20111010055546.GA1641@x4.trippels.de> <4E9EB187.40306@profihost.ag> <20111019113404.GA13670@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20111019113404.GA13670@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Tejun Heo , Markus Trippelsdorf , xfs@oss.sgi.com Am 19.10.2011 13:34, schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 01:16:23PM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: >> Any news on this problem? What happens with the next long term >> stable kernel 3.0.X? How do you proceed with this bug? > > The patches are in 3.1-rc10 and I have submitted them for 3.0-stable, > but haven't heard anything back from Greg yet. > Thanks! _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs