From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id pAE0PBxR169256 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:25:11 -0600 Received: from song.cn.fujitsu.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4595F24979E for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:25:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from song.cn.fujitsu.com (cn.fujitsu.com [222.73.24.84]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id R9BDCkxyjpdlKCAv for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:25:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4EC05F9C.7030106@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:23:56 +0800 From: Wanlong Gao MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfstests/071 FAIL with XFS Assertion References: <4EBCC112.3020108@cn.fujitsu.com> <20111113115223.GA19435@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20111113115223.GA19435@infradead.org> Reply-To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/13/2011 07:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:30:42PM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: >> v3.1.0-10325-g3155521 > > Hmm, this a is a test not run in the auto group. Do you have tested > it on older kernels where it works, aka do you know if this is a > regresion? > No, have not. I'll do it later. Thanks _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs