From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q04H4uts159707 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:04:56 -0600 Received: from mail.in8.de (brockman.in8.de [85.214.220.56]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DbeYkEuDU8B8DCKv for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:04:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F0486B3.8010301@jan-o-sch.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:04:51 +0100 From: Jan Schmidt MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: new check 278 to ensure btrfs backref integrity References: <1324552138-30584-1-git-send-email-list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> <20120104163946.GA8153@infradead.org> <4F0485FE.8000405@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <4F0485FE.8000405@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Jan Schmidt , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 04.01.2012 18:01, Eric Sandeen wrote: > 276 got merged on Dec 28 before my requests for fixup, I guess? And it > explicitly sets FSTYP=btrfs which is why it fails. > > the 278 patch v2 in this thread works ok for me. > > so munging the 278 patch here into the existing 276 should be the > right approach. Yeah we figured that out on irc some minutes ago :-) I'm currently building v2 as an incremental patch to 276 (without rename to 278) and send it as [PATCH] xfstests: fixup check 276 soon. -Jan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs