From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q0CH5YYj007603 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:05:34 -0600 Message-ID: <4F0F12DC.5020709@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:05:32 -0600 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] repair: cleanup inode record macros References: <20111202174619.179530033@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111202174743.697687824@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120111113020.GD10932@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120111113020.GD10932@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 01/11/12 05:30, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > ping? > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:46:31PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Remove indirections in the inode record bit manipulation macros and flatten >> them to a single level of inlines. Also use a common IREC_MASK define >> instead of duplicating it for every bitmask. >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig >> Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely The clean up looks good. I like the removal of the side effect that was in one of the ASSERT statement. --Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs