From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9847tsU102486 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2011 23:07:55 -0500 Message-ID: <4F144EFC.3010406@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:23:24 -0600 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfstests: rename USE_BIG_LOOPFS to be more generic References: <1321875088-30801-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1321875088-30801-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1321875088-30801-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On 01/-10/63 13:59, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > USE_BIG_LOOPFS is really misnamed - it can be used on real devices just as > easily as loop devices. It really means we are testing a large scratch device > and that we should enable the special filesystem filling and checking options > that enable xfstests to be run sanely on large XFS filesystems. > Looks good. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs