public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Christian Kildau <lists@unixhosts.org>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: How to fix bad superblock or xfs_repair: error - read only 0 of 512 bytes
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:57:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F1ED4DF.40907@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BE48F258-7061-468F-865E-3595D2C28B3B@unixhosts.org>

On 1/24/12 9:52 AM, Christian Kildau wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
>> On 1/24/12 9:46 AM, Christian Kildau wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 24, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Roger Willcocks wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 11:13 +0100, Christian Kildau wrote:
>>>>> Top posting... sorry.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have now found dozens of other users with a similar issue! e.g.
>>>>> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/cannot-mount-hard-disk-block-count-exceeds-size-of-device-bad-partition-table-880149/
>>>>>
>>>>> To make it short all of these users were running ext4 and a fs resize to the new geometry fixed their problems! Sadly XFS doesn't support shrinking the fs(?).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It seems fairly clear that your drive or the bios is lying about its
>>>> capacity. The filesystem occupies the entire disk, but the disk has
>>>> become 'smaller'. A quick web search suggests a 'hidden protected area'
>>>> - the two block counts in this link line up with the before and after
>>>> sizes you're seeing:
>>>>
>>>> http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=13440.0;wap2
>>>>
>>>> It would be instructive to see what 'hdparm -N /dev/sdd' says on your
>>>> system. And a dmesg log would be handy too.
>>>>
>>>> Note that this is /not/ a problem with xfs. The right fix is to tell the
>>>> drive to report its actual capacity, not to shrink the filesystem.
>>>
>>> I do understand that is definitely not an XFS issue, but some strange issue with ubuntu or their kernel patches...
>>>
>>> I got my data back by dumping the entire hdd (it was partitionless nevertheless) to a bigger 2TB hdd.
>>> XFS mounts without any problems and I can restore my data.
>>>
>>> Thanks all for your help!
>>
>> It's likely still missing the end of the filesystem, though.
>>
>> Can you run the hdparm command Roger suggested on your original hard drive, please?
> 
> Sure, here it is:
> 
> /dev/sde:
>  max sectors   = 2930275055/2930277168, HPA is enabled
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ding ding ding, we have a winner.

2930277168-2930275055 = 2113 which is about how much xfs tried to read past the end.

Something about the ubuntu upgrade messed with your disk.

I'd press them very hard to investigate & resolve that.  You can probably use hdparm
to remove the HPA and get your space back but this is beyond my expertise &
familiarity.  It'd be interesting to know what is _in_ the HPA area first.

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-24 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-21 10:29 How to fix bad superblock or xfs_repair: error - read only 0 of 512 bytes Christian Kildau
2012-01-23  4:31 ` Dave Chinner
2012-01-23  9:23   ` Christian Kildau
2012-01-24  5:04     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-01-24  7:08       ` Christian Kildau
2012-01-24 10:13       ` Christian Kildau
2012-01-24 14:12         ` Roger Willcocks
2012-01-24 15:46           ` Christian Kildau
2012-01-24 15:50             ` Eric Sandeen
2012-01-24 15:52               ` Christian Kildau
2012-01-24 15:57                 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2012-01-24 17:25                   ` Roger Willcocks
2012-01-24 18:10                     ` Christian Kildau
2012-01-23 10:43   ` Christian Kildau
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-12-28 11:11 Utpal Bora
2019-12-29  3:15 ` Chris Murphy
2019-12-29  5:58   ` Utpal Bora
2019-12-29  4:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2019-12-29  5:58   ` Utpal Bora
2012-01-21 10:03 Christian Kildau
2012-01-24  4:51 ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F1ED4DF.40907@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=lists@unixhosts.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox