From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q0V94KTc229145 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:04:20 -0600 Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id YMY4cD6UAslQHdcJ for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:04:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.100.53] (gffx.hardwarefreak.com [192.168.100.53]) by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DDE6C160 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:04:18 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4F27AE92.9060003@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:04:18 -0600 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: File system remain unresponsive until the system is rebooted. References: <20120131013124.GE9090@dastard> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 1/30/2012 11:04 PM, Supratik Goswami wrote: > We are using Amazon EC2 instances. ^^^^^^^^^^ I'd have never thought I would see those words on this list, except maybe as a joke, or as an example of one of the the worst possible platforms for XFS. I wish EC2 had been asked about during the QA session after Dave's presentation. I'm guessing some laughter would have been involved. ;) -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs