public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Tom Crane <T.Crane@rhul.ac.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs_repair segfaults with ag_stride option
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:58:24 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F2F6C00.5050108@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F2F23F3.9000402@rhul.ac.uk>

On 2/5/12 6:50 PM, Tom Crane wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> Many thanks for the quick response and the patch. It was a big help.
> I was able to repair our 60TB FS in about 30 hours. I have a couple
> of questions;
> 
> (1) The steps in the progress report seem a little strange. See the
> attachment. Is this expected?
> 
> (2) This may be a little out of band but I have heard second hand
> reports from another sysadmin that the xfs tools which come with SLC5
> (our current Linux distro) should not be relied upon and that SLC6
> should be used. Our 60TB FS is significantly fragmented (~40%) and I
> would very much like to run xfs_fsr on it. Given that I have built
> the latest xfsprogs, is there any reason I should be afraid of
> running xfs_fsr, on the FS which comes with SLC5? Unfortunately I
> don't have ~60TB spare storage space elsewhere to backup the FS
> before defragging. What would you advise?> 
> Many thanks

Newer tools are fine to use on older filesystems, there should be no
issue there.

running fsr can cause an awful lot of IO, and a lot of file reorganization.
(meaning, they will get moved to new locations on disk, etc).

How bad is it, really?  How did you arrive at the 40% number?  Unless
you see perf problems which you know you can attribute to fragmentation,
I might not worry about it.

You can also check the fragmentation of individual files with the
xfs_bmap tool.

-Eric

> Tom.
> 
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:36:12PM +0000, Tom Crane wrote:
>>  
>>> Dear XFS Support,
>>>    I am attempting to use xfs_repair to fix a damaged FS but always
>>> get a segfault if and only if -o ag_stride is specified. I have
>>> tried ag_stride=2,8,16 & 32.  The FS is approx 60T. I can't find
>>> reports of this particular problem on the mailing list archive.
>>> Further details are;
>>>
>>> xfs_repair version 3.1.7, recently downloaded via git repository.
>>> uname -a
>>> Linux store3 2.6.18-274.17.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 11 11:10:32 CET 2012
>>> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>     
>>
>> Thanks for the detailed bug report.
>>
>> Can you please try the attached patch?
>>
>>   
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-06  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-01 13:36 xfs_repair segfaults with ag_stride option Tom Crane
2012-02-02 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-06  0:50   ` Tom Crane
2012-02-06  5:58     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2012-02-06 11:19       ` Tom Crane
2012-02-06 13:21         ` Eric Sandeen
2012-02-07 17:41           ` Tom Crane
2012-02-07 18:00             ` Eric Sandeen
2012-02-08  9:00             ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-06 14:04     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F2F6C00.5050108@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=T.Crane@rhul.ac.uk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox