From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q17KqhFJ002040 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 14:52:43 -0600 Message-ID: <4F318F17.4010504@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:52:39 -0600 From: Bill Kendall MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: use the full 32-bit generation number References: <1325880565-20934-1-git-send-email-wkendall@sgi.com> <20120205133648.GA27225@infradead.org> <4F301079.9010505@sgi.com> <20120206174140.GA10315@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120206174140.GA10315@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:40:09AM -0600, Bill Kendall wrote: >> You were referring to an xfsdump option. What use case did you >> have in mind? Compatibility with an old restore? > > Yes. Ok, I can see the value in that if a filesystem is being moved to another system which has an older xfsrestore. I'll repost with that change as well as with an option for xfsrestore to truncate all generation numbers down to 12-bits as mentioned in my last mail. Bill _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs