From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q19Ifia1189306 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:41:44 -0600 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id dthoYM4soHmhJljp for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:41:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F341365.3010400@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:41:41 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Red Hat bug 643571 References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: shane.dempsey@emc.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 2/9/12 10:45 AM, shane.dempsey@emc.com wrote: > Hello, > > I believe Eric Sandee was working on this bug - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643571 to resolve a > fragmentation issue with XFS on RHEL 5.5. > > Do you know if this fix is in RHEL 6.1, kernel 2.6.32-131.0.15? RH support is the better avenue for these questions, FWIW. But from the comments in the bug: linux-2.6-fs-xfs-fix-speculative-allocation-beyond-eof.patch is what went in; [sandeen@sandeen linux-2.6]$ git log --pretty=oneline fs/xfs | grep "speculative allocation" 9f6c92b9cc2fd41d6c7b493be5637cc5b5659880 [XFS] Fix speculative allocation beyond eof [sandeen@sandeen linux-2.6]$ git describe --contains 9f6c92b9cc2fd41d6c7b493be5637cc5b5659880 v2.6.30-rc8~5^2~56 so it went into 2.6.30, so should be present in all later kernels. -Eric Sandeen-with-an-N ;) > > > > Regards, > > > > Shane. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs