public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Ems <richard.ems@cape-horn-eng.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ?
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:54:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3A3D78.9080108@cape-horn-eng.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120213211654.GA20192@infradead.org>

On 02/13/2012 10:16 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:48:58PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote:
>> I already updated to 3.2.4 and started the same "find dir" command again
>> that previously took 100 min to run. It has been running now for over 30
>> min ...
>>
>> Should this "find" run time also improve ?
> 
> No, not by that change anyway.
> 
>> Or will only unlink run time improve ?
> 
> Yes.

I ran a rm on a smaller dir, containing 9225 dirs and 425659 files and
it took ~37 sec on 3.1.9 and ~20 sec on 3.2.4, so I do see a good
improvement there.

Thanks,
Richard


-- 
Richard Ems       mail: Richard.Ems@Cape-Horn-Eng.com

Cape Horn Engineering S.L.
C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso
46011 Valencia
Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924
http://www.cape-horn-eng.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-02-14 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-13 16:57 XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ? Richard Ems
2012-02-13 17:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-13 17:11   ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 17:15     ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-13 17:26       ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 17:29         ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-13 17:53           ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 18:02             ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-13 18:06               ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 18:10                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-13 18:18                   ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 18:48                   ` Richard Ems
2012-02-13 21:16                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-14  5:31                       ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-02-14  9:48                       ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 19:43                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-14  9:49                       ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 10:54                       ` Richard Ems [this message]
2012-02-14 11:44                       ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14  0:09 ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-14 12:32   ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 19:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-15 12:07       ` Richard Ems
2012-02-15  1:27     ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-15 12:07       ` Richard Ems
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-14 13:02 Richard Ems
     [not found] ` <4F3AA191.9030606@mnsu.edu>
2012-02-14 18:12   ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 19:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-15 12:48       ` Richard Ems
2012-02-14 23:10 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-02-15 15:54   ` Richard Ems

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F3A3D78.9080108@cape-horn-eng.com \
    --to=richard.ems@cape-horn-eng.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox