From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1FCmwaY177138 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:48:59 -0600 Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.29.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9gRkZplxvPDB4xDw for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [62.43.225.238] (helo=[192.168.30.191]) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1RxeI4-0007lS-RJ for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:48:56 +0100 Message-ID: <4F3BA9B8.4080204@cape-horn-eng.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:48:56 +0100 From: Richard Ems MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ? References: <4F3A5B49.6020803@cape-horn-eng.com> <4F3AA191.9030606@mnsu.edu> <4F3AA40D.50302@cape-horn-eng.com> <20120214190753.GA8383@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120214190753.GA8383@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 02/14/2012 08:07 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:12:29PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote: >> # /net/c3m/usr/local/software/XFS/summarise_stat.pl /bin/ >> 9 6.2% are scripts (shell, perl, whatever) >> 65 44.8% don't use any stat() family calls at all >> 61 42.1% use 32-bit stat() family interfaces only >> 9 6.2% use 64-bit stat64() family interfaces only >> 1 0.7% use both 32-bit and 64-bit stat() family interfaces >> >> So I was not sure if I should use inode64 or not. > = > Are you on a 32-bit system (userspace, kernel doesn't matter)? No, I have been running on 64-bit systems for years. That output above is on openSUSE 12.1 64-bit. > If the system is 64-bit even the plain stat handles 64-bit inodes just > fine. With *plain stat* you mean the *32-bit stat* listed above ? Is it then safe to switch all XFS partitions to be mounted with inode64 on 64-bit systems? Also for NFS v3 exports? >>From the XFS FAQ I read that it should work, also for NFS v3, and that I can try it and switch back if there are problems, so I will give it a try! Many thanks again for your time and help! Richard -- = Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@Cape-Horn-Eng.com Cape Horn Engineering S.L. C/ Dr. J.J. D=F3mine 1, 5=BA piso 46011 Valencia Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924 http://www.cape-horn-eng.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs