public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernhard Schrader <bernhard.schrader@innogames.de>
To: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Problems with filesizes on different Kernels
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:41:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F420726.6060000@innogames.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120217123335.GA9671@citd.de>

On 02/17/2012 01:33 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On 17.02.2012 12:51, Bernhard Schrader wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> we just discovered a problem, which I think is related to XFS. Well,
>> I will try to explain.
>>
>> The environment i am working with are around 300 Postgres databases
>> in separated VM's. All are running with XFS. Differences are just in
>> kernel versions.
>> - 2.6.18
>> - 2.6.39
>> - 3.1.4
>>
>> Some days ago i discovered that the file nodes of my postgresql
>> tables have strange sizes. They are located in
>> /var/lib/postgresql/9.0/main/base/[databaseid]/
>> If I execute the following commands i get results like this:
>>
>> Command: du -sh | tr "\n" " "; du --apparent-size -h
>> Result: 6.6G	. 5.7G	.
>
> Since a few kernel-version XFS does speculative preallocations, which is
> primarily a measure to prevent fragmentation.
>
> The preallocations should go away when you drop the caches.
>
> sync
> echo 3>  /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> XFS can be prevented to do that with the mount-option "allocsize".
> Personally i use "allocsize=64k", since i first encountered that
> behaviour, my workload primarily consists of single-thread writing which
> doesn't benefit from this preallocation.
> Your workload OTOH may benefit as it should prevent/lower the
> fragmentation of the database files.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bis denn
>

Hi Matthias,
thanks for the reply, as far as i can say the "echo 3 > 
/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches" didn't work. the sizes didnt shrink. Today i 
had the chance to test the allocsize=64k. Well, first i thought it 
worked, i added the mountoption, restarted the server, everything shrink 
to normal sizes. but right now its more or less "flapping". I have 5.7GB 
real data and the sizes flap between 6.9GB to 5.7GB.
But I am wondering a little about the mount output:

# mount
/dev/xvda1 on / type xfs 
(rw,noatime,nodiratime,logbufs=8,nobarrier,allocsize=64k)
tmpfs on /lib/init/rw type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,mode=0755)
proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=620)


# cat /proc/mounts
rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
/dev/root / xfs rw,noatime,nodiratime,attr2,delaylog,nobarrier,noquota 0 0
tmpfs /lib/init/rw tmpfs rw,nosuid,relatime,mode=755 0 0
proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
sysfs /sys sysfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime 0 0
devpts /dev/pts devpts 
rw,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0


In normal mount output i see the allocsize, but not in cat /proc/mounts?!?

Is there a way to completly disable speculative prealocations? or the 
behavior how it works right now?


regards
Bernhard

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-20  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-17 11:51 Problems with filesizes on different Kernels Bernhard Schrader
2012-02-17 12:33 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-20  8:41   ` Bernhard Schrader [this message]
2012-02-20 11:06     ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-20 12:06       ` Bernhard Schrader
2012-02-27  8:23         ` Bernhard Schrader

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F420726.6060000@innogames.de \
    --to=bernhard.schrader@innogames.de \
    --cc=ms@citd.de \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox