From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1SGEQg0201378 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:14:26 -0600 Message-ID: <4F4CFD63.8010506@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:14:27 -0600 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfs: do not require an ioend for new EOF calculation References: <20120221003824.415885674@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120221003906.313004161@bombadil.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120221003906.313004161@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 02/20/12 18:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Replace xfs_ioend_new_eof with a new inline xfs_new_eof helper that > doesn't require and ioend, and is available also outside of xfs_aops.c. > > Also make the code a bit more clear by using a normal if statement > instead of a slightly misleading MIN(). > > Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Looks good. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs