From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q215A2v6078715 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:10:02 -0600 Received: from mail.sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ZsFZM2RsLtWMcGZg for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:10:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4F04A7.4030500@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:09:59 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Warning from unlock_new_inode References: <20120222220137.GB3650@quack.suse.cz> <20120228083444.GB22995@infradead.org> <20120229005351.GV3592@dastard> <20120229014906.GX3592@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20120229014906.GX3592@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jan Kara , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 2/28/12 7:49 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: ... > Jan, can you try the (untested) patch below? > > Cheers, > > Dave. Just for the list's benefit - we tested this with the in-house NFS benchmark reproducer, and the tester also reported success. Thanks Dave! -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs