From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q21Kv7Tl182879 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:57:07 -0600 Received: from busoni.debian.org (busoni.debian.org [140.211.15.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FwX7BnHHvDWtEjHr (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:57:06 -0800 (PST) Subject: Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Message-ID: Message-ID: <4F4FE24C.6050304@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:55:40 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120301081409.3103.43155.reportbug@frosties.localnet> <20120301083345.GA24409@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120301083345.GA24409@infradead.org> Reply-To: Eric Sandeen , 661580@bugs.debian.org List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig , 661580@bugs.debian.org Cc: Goswin von Brederlow On 3/1/12 2:33 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:14:09AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> And I can confirm that the sector size detection is still broken in >> 3.1.7. > > That's a known bug that Carlos wanted to look into. If you really can't > accept smaller I/O without major pain make sure to use a larger logical > blocksize, which should be handled fine by everything. Carlos is a bit busy right now, I'll send a patch shortly; want to whip up an xfstest for this too. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs