From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] xfs: reimplement fdatasync support
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:04:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5135D6.3020207@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120229095509.559250501@bombadil.infradead.org>
On 02/29/12 03:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add an in-memory only flag to say we logged timestamps only, and use it to
> check if fdatasync can optimize away the log force.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de>
>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 +++++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 3 ++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-02 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-29 9:53 [PATCH 0/8] log all inode updates V3 Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-29 9:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-29 9:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: do not require an ioend for new EOF calculation Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-29 9:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: make xfs_inode_item_size idempotent Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-02 16:31 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-07 21:02 ` Ben Myers
2012-02-29 9:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: split in-core and on-disk inode log item fields Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-02 19:40 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-08 18:40 ` Ben Myers
2012-02-29 9:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: reimplement fdatasync support Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-02 21:04 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
2012-03-08 20:06 ` Ben Myers
2012-03-08 20:08 ` [PATCH 0/8] log all inode updates V3 Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5135D6.3020207@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox