From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q22L4ObD145967 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:04:24 -0600 Message-ID: <4F5135D6.3020207@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:04:22 -0600 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] xfs: reimplement fdatasync support References: <20120229095347.009884687@bombadil.infradead.org> <20120229095509.559250501@bombadil.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120229095509.559250501@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 02/29/12 03:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Add an in-memory only flag to say we logged timestamps only, and use it to > check if fdatasync can optimize away the log force. > > Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > --- > fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 +++++-- > fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 3 ++- > fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.h | 11 ++++++++++- > fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs