From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q2CHnHGZ114627 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:49:17 -0500 Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.95]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Vk8zVo3oIGN248w2 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [62.43.225.238] (helo=[192.168.30.191]) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1S79Mw-0001Bo-IE for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:49:14 +0100 Message-ID: <4F5E371A.4000004@cape-horn-eng.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:49:14 +0100 From: Richard Ems MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: 3.2.9 and locking problem References: <201203092028.47177.arekm@maven.pl> <20120312005325.GX5091@dastard> <201203121443.59217.arekm@maven.pl> <20120312161425.GA23815@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120312161425.GA23815@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi Christoph, On 03/12/2012 05:14 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > In the 3.2 version xfs_sync_flags does a double unlock of the ilock - > change the last argument of xfs_trans_ijoin from XFS_ILOCK_EXCL to 0 > will fix this. The 3.0 version doesn't have this bug. Is there already a fix or will there be one for 3.2.10 ? I am already using 3.2.x on 4 servers in production ... Thanks, Richard -- = Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@Cape-Horn-Eng.com Cape Horn Engineering S.L. C/ Dr. J.J. D=F3mine 1, 5=BA piso 46011 Valencia Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924 http://www.cape-horn-eng.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs