From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix buffer lookup race on allocation failure
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:53:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F749384.2000702@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1333022846-12697-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
On 03/29/12 07:07, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> When memory allocation fails to add the page array or tht epages to
> a buffer during xfs_buf_get(), the buffer is left in the cache in a
> partially initialised state. There is enough state left for the next
> lookup on that buffer to find the buffer, and for the buffer to then
> be used without finishing the initialisation. As a result, when an
> attempt to do IO on the buffer occurs, it fails with EIO because
> there are no pages attached to the buffer.
>
> We cannot remove the buffer from the cache immediately and free it,
> because there may already be a racing lookup that is blocked on the
> buffer lock. hence the moment we unlock the buffer to then free it,
> the other user is woken and we have a use-after-free situation.
>
> Hence we have to mark the buffer as "broken" and check that after we
> have gained the buffer lock on a cache hit lookup. This enables
> racing lookups to avoid the broken buffer and drop their references,
> allowing the buffer to be freed.
>
> This however, doesn't solve the problem completely - there may be a
> delay in the buffer getting freed (e.g. pre-emption), so when we try
> the lookup a second time with a new buffer to insert into the tree,
> if we find the broken buffer again, drop the buffer lock, sleep for
> a short while, and try the lookup again. When the broken bufer is
> finally removed from the cache we will make forwards progress.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h | 2 ++
> fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-29 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-29 12:07 [PATCH] xfs: fix buffer lookup race on allocation failure Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 16:53 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
2012-03-29 19:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-29 21:04 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F749384.2000702@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox