public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] xfs: clean up buffer get/read call API
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:12:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F76058A.2010602@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1333023835-12856-5-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>

On 03/29/12 07:23, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> The xfs_buf_get/read API is not consistent in the units it uses, and
> does not use appropriate or consistent units/types for the
> variables.
>
> Convert the API to use disk addresses and block counts for all
> buffer get and read calls. Use consistent naming for all the
> functions and their declarations, and convert the internal functions
> to use disk addresses and block counts to avoid need to convert them
> from one type to another and back again.
>
> Fix all the callers to use disk addresses and block counts. In many
> cases, this removes an additional conversion from the function call
> as the callers already have a block count.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch@lst.de>
> ---

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-30 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-29 12:23 [PATCH 0/8] xfs: clean up unit usage in xfs_buf V2 Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: check for buffer errors before waiting Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:04   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 21:10     ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 21:48       ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 22:07         ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-29 21:17     ` Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: fix incorrect b_offset initialisation Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-29 20:43   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] xfs: use kmem_zone_zalloc for buffers Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-29 20:45   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] xfs: clean up buffer get/read call API Dave Chinner
2012-03-30 19:12   ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] xfs: kill b_file_offset Dave Chinner
2012-03-30 19:12   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: use blocks for counting length of buffers Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-30 19:13   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: use blocks for storing the desired IO size Dave Chinner
2012-03-30 19:13   ` Mark Tinguely
2012-03-29 12:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: kill xfs_buf_btoc Dave Chinner
2012-03-29 19:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-03-30 19:13   ` Mark Tinguely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F76058A.2010602@sgi.com \
    --to=tinguely@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox