public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: b.candler@pobox.com
Subject: Re: Fragmentation Issue We Are Having
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:54:50 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F906D8A.9040504@sauce.co.nz> (raw)

Brian Candler wrote:

--------------------------

Ah, that's new to me. So with inode32 and
   sysctl fs.xfs.rotorstep=255
you can get roughly the same locality benefit for sequentially-written files
as inode64?  (Aside: if you have two processes writing files to two 
different
directories, will they end up mixing their files in the same AG? That
could hurt performance at readback time if reading them sequentially)

-----------------------------

The "filestreams" mount option may be of use here, see:

http://xfs.org/docs/xfsdocs-xml-dev/XFS_User_Guide//tmp/en-US/html/ch06s16.html

and page 17 of:

http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/training/xfs_slides_06_allocators.pdf

Regards,

Richard

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

             reply	other threads:[~2012-04-19 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-19 19:54 Richard Scobie [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-12  1:04 Fragmentation Issue We Are Having David Fuller
2012-04-12  2:16 ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-12  2:55   ` David Fuller
2012-04-12  4:24     ` Eric Sandeen
2012-04-12  7:57 ` Brian Candler
2012-04-13  0:09   ` David Fuller
2012-04-13  7:19     ` Brian Candler
2012-04-13  7:56       ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-13  8:17         ` Brian Candler
2012-04-17  0:26           ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-17  8:58             ` Brian Candler
2012-04-18  1:36               ` Dave Chinner
2012-04-18  9:00                 ` Brian Candler
2012-04-19 23:12                   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F906D8A.9040504@sauce.co.nz \
    --to=richard@sauce.co.nz \
    --cc=b.candler@pobox.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox